You can download the solution to the following question for free. For further assistance in English assignments please check our offerings in English assignment solutions. Our subject-matter experts provide online assignment help to English students from across the world and deliver plagiarism free solution with free Grammarly report with every solution.
(ExpertAssignmentHelp does not recommend anyone to use this sample as their own work.)
Write a Short critique of an Article on New York Times.
Review your requirements with our FREE Assignment Understanding Brief and avoid last minute chaos.
We provide you services from PhD experts from well known universities across the globe.
No more plagiarism worries. We give you a FREE Grammarly report with every assignment.
In the column of The New York Times, David Brooks has written about 'The Inequality Problem', wherein he has tried to throw light on the social aspect of the problem of Inequality. He starts by a brief introduction of two classes of people consisting of the rich and poor and how the economists point it to be the problem of inequality. However, Brook is of the view that people simply assume this problem to be the real issue and do not focus on the reasons for inequality. David Brook points out that the issue is not of economic inequality and by terming it as this will not resolve the situation, in fact, it will make it more complicated and difficult to understand. He agrees and writes that inequality is simply a consequence of other issues that take place in the society, which he explains throughout the article (Brooks, D., 2015).
He argues that the rich have nothing to do with the poor and they are not responsible for the growing economic inequality. Moreover, by increasing the wages of the poor will also not resolve the issue because it does not target the right people. He considers people to be poor because of high dropout rates, the breakdown of the family and the minimizing of low skill-based jobs. So, the increase in minimum wage is a popular solution and represents popular politics, however, it is not an effective policy because the research reveals it to be an ineffective method (Jordan, K. and Hunter, B., 2010).
What Brook later points out is that the problem is not that people are paid less, but the problem is that either they do not work full time or they do not work at all. Therefore, relating the rich and poor as affecting each other is an erroneous notion. David Brook then reveals that how social causes lead to economic results in the lives of people. He states that single motherhood and low social mobility has a relation, just like deindustrialization has a relation with low social mobility (Brooks, D., 2015). He also adds and says that people often have an impact on their earnings prospects with the kind of behavior that they follow. Thus, what Brook points out is that the social aspects are the reasons for economic inequality. And these social consequences result in low income. Therefore, to say that low income is the problem is wrong and people fail to understand the real reasons behind it. This thinking simply confuses the whole topic and shows a different direction, which is also supported by all types of governments. However, it is important to understand the real reason and work towards it (Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A., 2000).
Brooks, D. (2015). The Inequality Problem. The New York Times.
Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2000). Happiness, economy, and institutions. The Economic Journal, 110(466), 918-938.