You can download the solution to the following question for free. For further assistance in Teaching And Education assignments please check our offerings in Teaching And Education assignment solutions. Our subject-matter experts provide online assignment help to Teaching And Education students from across the world and deliver plagiarism free solution with free Grammarly report with every solution.
(ExpertAssignmentHelp does not recommend anyone to use this sample as their own work.)
Congratulations on completing the first unit of the subject!
In the second unit, we are going to explore the ways in which we can enact a social approach to literacy in classroom practices, in particular in the teaching of reading. We will introduce the notion of scaffolding learning and look at how it can be implemented in a text-based reading program as well as in the design of classroom interactions. Our main learning goal in this unit is to help you develop some basic knowledge of text and context that will assist you in planning and delivering reading programs.
We will spend about four weeks on this unit. Each week, you are required to complete a set of readings on a given topic. You are also encouraged to participate in discussions and various learning activities in the seminars or online. By the end of the unit, you are expected to
□ be able to identify basic story and factual genres and describe the three contextual variables (field, mode & tenor) of a text;
□ able to recognise some basic language/visual patterns of a text in relation to its context, including (visual) processes & participants, language and visual resources for interaction;
□ develop a basic understanding of scaffolding learning and its implementation in a reading program; □ based on the above, compose a text portfolio that is theoretically (theory of literacy as well as language) informed and embodies the basic principles of scaffolding learning for a given context of teaching.
Once we have completed Unit 2, you will have an opportunity to evaluate how well you have performed in this unit through Assessment Task 2 Text portfolio (due on Friday, 18 September).
Review your requirements with our FREE Assignment Understanding Brief and avoid last minute chaos.
We provide you services from PhD experts from well known universities across the globe.
No more plagiarism worries. We give you a FREE Grammarly report with every assignment.
This reading programme is designed for a niche student group with a fairly advanced level of linguistic proficiency. The teaching aim is to harness students' research writing skills for the specific purpose of abstract writing. Most often, students face problems while choosing an appropriate journal or in understanding the requirements of the organization/university they dream of working with. To maintain a level of academic formality and simultaneously express personal views through research is a skill that can be developed only through practice and experience. Potential academicians such as this student group need assistance with comprehensively phrasing their years of work in a short abstract of 300words. Research corundum such as this, cannot be solved with the help of subject expertise alone. Hence, this teaching program is a balance between academic and linguistic expertise.
The three samples chosen are well-structured abstracts of the Humanities discipline. The purpose of selecting from a specific register, i.e. Historical Analysis is to give the students an overview of how language works within the framework of one academic genre. The following account is an effort to analyze Table 1 to demonstrate that deconstructing rhetorical devices can facilitating researchers to use rhetorical devices to structure their work more effectively. The intention is to support these views with the help of pedagogical theories of writing in higher studies discussed by Estela Inés Moyano.
The texts part of this portfolio was selected based on a careful analysis of a few problems that scholars frequently face while writing abstracts for various purposes. The queries included in this teaching program are developed through an interaction with research scholars and my personal experience of academic scenario. The profiling of these abstracts will enable the group to assess various styles of abstract writing. Apart from providing a point of reference, the group can also assess their academic standpoint on the basis of these texts. Hence, an abstract must be placed in the larger contextual framework. Text 2, explicitly explains the social and artistic context of the project. Having focused largely on the content of their research, the form of abstract writing can sometimes remain neglected. It is the attempt of this programme to emphasize the importance of linguistic devices and writing methodologies in abstract writing. The systematic analysis of each of these texts will shed light on the following:
– Research purpose: Text one begins by clearly stating, 'This project involves discovering how the American Revolution was remembered during the nineteenth century.'
Text 3 states, 'I use two major research strategies: (1) a quantitative analysis of county-level data and (2) three case studies. Data have been collected from archives, interviews, newspapers, and published reports.'
This teaching module is based on the findings of the Project to Develop Literacy Across the Curriculum (PRODEAC) program which suggests that there is a 'tendency to ignore that written activities affect knowledge acquisition and understanding.' (Moyano, 2010. p. 444) It is however clear through this project that understanding an academic field through research writing is a possibility. PRODEAC proposes that collaboration between language professors and subject experts is relevant in teaching academic/scientific writing (Moyano, 2010. p.446). The pedagogical model in this program is comparable to PRODEAC that proposes 'teaching genres and their realization through language' (Moyano, 2010. p.447).