You can download the solution to the following question for free. For further assistance in Finance and Accounting assignments please check our offerings in Accounting assignment solutions. Our subject-matter experts provide online assignment help to Accounting students from across the world and deliver plagiarism free solution with free Grammarly report with every solution.
(ExpertAssignmentHelp does not recommend anyone to use this sample as their own work.)
PART A (50 marks) Body of the internal report
Assume that you are employed by a consumer watch group (CHOSEN) to assess sustainability performance of organisations. You have been assigned by your General Manager, Teresa Green, to assess Wesfarmers Limited. Wesfarmers Limited is an Australian conglomerate, headquartered in Perth, Western Australia, with interests predominantly in Australian and New Zealand retail, as well as in chemicals, fertilisers, coal mining and industrial and safety products.
The sustainability reports for 2014 and 2015 are accessible through the two links below
2014 report: http://www.wesresources.com.au/sustainability_report_2014/ 2015 report: http://www.wesresources.com.au/sustainability_report_2015/
Requirement for Part A
Provide an internal report to Teresa so she can combine it with reports about other companies that she will present to the board of directors. In your internal report (under a section named 'Wesfamers Comparison') assess and compare the 2014 sustainability report to the 2015 sustainability report in relation to the G4 GRI Guidelines. You should note areas of improved sustainability performance for the three aspects; economics, environmental and social (also considering the four (4) sub-categories of the social aspect) between the 2014 and the 2015 report. Try to think which of the guidelines would be most relevant to this business. Does the report contain targets? How detailed (well specified) are these targets?
You should also note (in the body of your report):
The self declared level of adherence and whether you agree that this is an appropriate description of the level. For justification of your choice please refer to the GRI G4 'in accordance' guidance.
Any guidelines followed in preparing the report (this should at least be GRI but may also include the standard AA1000AS or the UN Global Compact, or Industry Regulations/Guidelines)
Whether the report has been verified or not, and if so, who was the verifier (comment on the type of business e.g. Accountants/other specialist), and what is the scope of the assurance.
You will also need to download the G4 guidelines from the study desk, and other material you believe are helpful, free from the GRI website.
The body of your review and analysis does not need to cover all aspects of disclosure, but should be a general assessment with reference to the GRI Reporting Principles and Standard Disclosures. You should use the GRI Guidelines themselves. The Guidelines give examples of tests for assessment (e.g., ability to compare year to year, use of benchmarks, etc).
A suggested layout is to use a table with the aspect of the report being assessed on the left e.g. completeness and your comments and conclusion on the right.
Comment on how 'user-friendly' you found the report. Was it easy to find the parts of the report relevant to a particular guideline? Was the report well referenced? Did it give a balanced view (negative as well as positive aspects)?
The key is to cover the main points (for this type of business) and to present it in a professional manner (full report format is not required BUT presentation should be businesslike and neat and references are required). However, this is a general overview rather than a complete detailed review of all possible aspects (see Useful links below for more information). Stick to core disclosures plus additional ones that seem relevant for this type of business. Use the GRI index provided by the company as a starting point – but be critical. What have they not covered? Have they appropriately identified things (issues) as material?
PART B Company's Sustainability reports comparison written in two countries (30 marks)
Secondly, as an employee of a consumer watch group, you are asked to make a comparison on the sustainability reporting by Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Limited. You note that Fuji Xerox Australia Pty Limited sustainability did release a 2014 report available on the websites Fxasustainability.Com.Au but not a 2015 report. You find that the 2015 sustainability report was produced by Fuji Xerox Head Office in Japan.
You notice some differences in the guidelines used for reporting and disclosure in its Japan 2015 sustainability report compared to the 2014 report produced in Australia.
Requirement for Part B
Provide in your internal report the following information under a separate section named 'Fuji Xerox comparison'
PART C Professional Writing style, Conclusions, and Recommendations (10 marks)
You are required to develop separate conclusions based solely on your analysis under (1) Part A for Wesfamers and (2) Part B for Fuji Xerox. Your recommendations you formulate must be then based on your conclusions (that is, no new discussion or analysis can be introduced into either your conclusions or your recommendations).
Your report writing, sentence structure, and grammar must be prepared in a highly professional manner and format.
PART D Reflective journal of personal development (10 marks)
Your reflective personal journal should be completed separately to the internal report BUT in the same Word document under the heading 'PART D Reflective journal of personal development'. Your writing should reflect on how your personal development has been aided by your completion of the two assessment tasks.
An example of a reflective journal will be provided on the ACC8801 study desk.
When completing your reflection journal on personal development, you should consider what you have learned by completing the various topics of the five (5) modules.
You also should reflect on how you could apply these learning outcomes to your current employment situation or to a real world situation that you are likely to experience in the near future. Specific prompts to help you through your reflective journal are provided in the marking criteria at the end of this document.
Review your requirements with our FREE Assignment Understanding Brief and avoid last minute chaos.
We provide you services from PhD experts from well known universities across the globe.
No more plagiarism worries. We give you a FREE Grammarly report with every assignment.
Our experts work round the clock to provide you with solutions before the scheduled deadline.
Sustainability reporting helps an organisation to report in a holistic way on the important factors affecting the organisation, which is of material interest to its stakeholders. The different factors include the economic, environment, social and governance aspects. This helps the organisations to project themselves as more transparent with respect to the different risks and opportunities that the organisation faces. The sustainability reporting standards are published by GRI. In this report, the guidelines followed for sustainability report at Wesfarmers, and Fuji Xerox is discussed. This report also discusses in depth about the GRI guidelines. In this report, the sustainability reports of Wesfarmers for the year 2014 and 2015 is compared and analysed. For Fuji Xerox, the sustainability report for years 2014 and 2015 is analysed. The 2014 report of Fuji Xerox was prepared in Australia while the 2015 report was prepared in Japan. The report also presents the conclusion and recommendations with respect to Wesfarmers and Fuji Xerox. Finally, the report concludes with a reflective report which highlights the key learning points from this task.